Test and item response theories and school environment as assessment practice factors among science and mathematics teachers in secondary schools in eastern Uganda.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Manyiraho, Deborah
dc.contributor.author Atibuni, Dennis Zami
dc.contributor.author Olema, David Kani
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-22T12:05:16Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-22T12:05:16Z
dc.date.issued 2020-12
dc.identifier.citation Manyiraho, D., Atibuni, D. Z. & Olema, D. K. (2020). Test and item response theories and school environment as assessment practice factors among science and mathematics teachers in secondary schools in eastern Uganda. EAJESS October – December 2020, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 77-86. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2020v01i03.0045. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2714-2132
dc.identifier.issn 2714-2183
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/914
dc.description Article en_US
dc.description.abstract This study sought to establish the effect of knowledge of the Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) and school assessment environment on assessment practice among teachers of science and mathematics subjects in Eastern Uganda Secondary Schools. The study assessed the levels of knowledge and application of CTT and IRT in assessment, examined the suitability of school environment for assessment and established the influence of school environment and knowledge of CTT and IRT on teachers’ engagement in assessment. A census of 307 teachers of science and mathematics subjects attending SESEMAT training in Eastern Uganda participated in the study. The results revealed that the teachers were engaged in assessment (M = 17.04, SD = 2.00) and had moderate levels of knowledge of CTT (M = 10.19, SD = 2.23) and IRT (M = 17.5, SD = 3.50). Their levels of application of CTT (M = 28.08, SD = 3.85) and IRT (M = 6.86, SD = 1.47) were also moderate. The teachers reported that their schools had somewhat conducive environments for assessment (M = 14.37, SD = 3.44). In addition, school environment affected teachers’ assessment practices most ( = .211, t = 7.212, p < .05), knowledge of CTT also influenced teachers’ assessment practice, but less than the influence by environment ( = .112, t = 4.969, p < .05). In conclusion, enhancing the levels of knowledge and application of CTT and IRT as well as improving school assessment environment are paramount for meaningful engagement in assessment by teachers. The study recommended pre-service and in-service training of the teachers in CTT and IRT in addition to schools improving environments for effective teacher engagement and quality assessment. Keywords: Assessment, Item Response Theory, Classical Test Theory, Assessment Environment, engagement en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Busitema University, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park Kingsway en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher G-Card en_US
dc.subject Assessment en_US
dc.subject Item Response Theory en_US
dc.subject Classical Test Theory en_US
dc.subject Assessment Environment en_US
dc.subject Engagement en_US
dc.title Test and item response theories and school environment as assessment practice factors among science and mathematics teachers in secondary schools in eastern Uganda. en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BUOADIR


Browse

My Account