Bayesian inference for heterogeneity in meta-analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bodnar, Olha
dc.contributor.author Muhumuza, Rebecca Nalule
dc.contributor.author Possolo, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-30T09:06:01Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-30T09:06:01Z
dc.date.issued 2020-10-30
dc.identifier.citation Bodnar, O., Muhumuza, R., & Possolo, A. (2020). Bayesian inference for heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Metrologia 57 (2020) 064004 (13pp), https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/abb064. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/676
dc.description Article en_US
dc.description.abstract A generalized marginal random effects model is described that enables exact Bayesian inference using either the Jeffreys or Berger-Bernardo non-informative prior distributions without the need for Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling, requiring only numerical integrations. This contribution focuses on inference for the heterogeneity parameter, often called “dark uncertainty” and denoted τ in this contribution. The proposed models are used for consensus building in meta-analyses of measurement results for the Newtonian constant of gravitation, G, and for the effectiveness of anti-retroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis in preventing HIV infection. The estimates of τ that seventeen alternative different methods produce, including those that we propose, were also compared. The relative impact (gauged in terms of the ratio of the range of estimates to their median) that model choice had on the estimate of τ was very substantial: 79% for G and 87% for HIV prophylaxis. For G, the estimates of τ ranged from 0.0009×10−10m3kg−1s−2 to 0.0013×10−10m3kg−1s−2. For Truvada they ranged from 0.49 to 0.92. Since the estimate of τ impacts the quality of the estimate of the measurand substantially, we recommend the Bayesian approaches to estimate τ because they take the whole posterior distribution of τ into account, hence the corresponding uncertainty, rather than using a single value and pretending that it is known with certainty. In the case of the measurement results for G, we found that the model with Student’s t random effects and the Jeffreys prior provides the best fit, while for the Truvada data the normal marginal random effects model, also with Jeffreys prior, produces an estimate of τ closest to classical estimators like DerSimonian-Laird, but offers the advantage of recognizing and propagating the uncertainty associated with τ, which the classical procedures ignore. Keywords: marginal distribution, random effects, dark uncertainty, non-informative prior, shades of dark uncertainty, Jeffreys, Berger-Bernardo en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Busitema University en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Busitema University ; IOP Publishing en_US
dc.subject Marginal distribution en_US
dc.subject Random effects en_US
dc.subject Dark uncertainty en_US
dc.subject Non-informative prior en_US
dc.subject Shades of dark uncertainty en_US
dc.subject Jeffreys en_US
dc.subject Berger-Bernardo en_US
dc.title Bayesian inference for heterogeneity in meta-analysis en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BUOADIR


Browse

My Account