Decentralised governance of wetland resources in the Lake Victoria Basin of Uganda

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nakiyemba, Alice
dc.contributor.author Isabirye, Moses
dc.contributor.author Poesen, Jean
dc.contributor.author Maertens, Miet
dc.contributor.author Deckers, Jozef
dc.contributor.author Mathijs, Erik
dc.date.accessioned 2018-07-25T14:07:40Z
dc.date.available 2018-07-25T14:07:40Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.issn 2158-7086
dc.identifier.uri 10.4236/nr.2013.41006
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/94
dc.description.abstract Recent studies on decentralized wetland governance in Uganda have focused mainly on the relationship between central and local governments. Less attention has been given to the relationship between agricultural systems, local govern- ments, and water bodies. This study aims at assessing decentralized wetlands governance in the upper river Rwizi and Iguluibi micro catchments, Lake Victoria Basin Uganda, in relation to farming practices. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to provide a comprehensive understanding of the contribution of decentralized governance to the management of wetlands resources. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive summary statistics with the help of Statistical package for Social Sciences (SPSS) soft ware. Qualitative data analysis involved the categoriza-tion of verbal and behavioral data for purposes of classification with the use of Nvivo soft ware. Data were analyzed at two levels: the descriptive level of analysis which is the account of the data in terms of what was said, documented or observed with nothing assumed about it. The second level of analysis was interpretive, where data is transformed into what is meant by the responses and conclusions are drawn. All recorded interviews were transcribed into a written re-port. Findings revealed that decentralized wetlands governance has brought ecosystem services nearer to communities in form of community-based management planning. However, results indicated inadequate institutional capacity, knowledge gaps of existing legal frameworks, limited political support and accountability for local leaders, lack of co-operation and coordination, and inadequate funding. In all, the policy has not fully realized its intended outcomes. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Belgian Technical Coopera- tion (BTC) VLIR-OI RIPaVic project Uganda en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Scientific Research Publishing en_US
dc.subject Agricultural Systems en_US
dc.subject Decentralized Governance en_US
dc.subject Lake Victoria en_US
dc.subject Wetland Degradation en_US
dc.subject Uganda en_US
dc.title Decentralised governance of wetland resources in the Lake Victoria Basin of Uganda en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BUOADIR


Browse

My Account