Prevalence, indications, and community perceptions of caesarean section delivery in Ngora district, eastern Uganda :

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Waniala, Isaac
dc.contributor.author Nakiseka, Sandra
dc.contributor.author Nambi, Winnie
dc.contributor.author Naminya, Isaac
dc.contributor.author Ajeni, Margret Osuban
dc.contributor.author Iramiot, Jacob
dc.contributor.author Nekaka, Rebecca
dc.contributor.author Nteziyaremye, Julius
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-22T13:12:14Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-22T13:12:14Z
dc.date.issued 2020-07-20
dc.identifier.citation Waniala, Isaac . . . [et al.]. Prevalence, indications, and community perceptions of caesarean section delivery in Ngora district, eastern Uganda : mixed method study. Obstetrics and Gynecology International Volume 2020, Article ID 5036260, 11 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5036260. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/651
dc.description Article en_US
dc.description.abstract Background. Uganda has a high maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 336/100,000 live births. Caesarean section is fundamental in achieving equity and equality in emergency obstetric care services. Despite it being a lifesaving intervention, it is associated with risks. There has been a surge in caesarean section rates in some areas, yet others remain underserved. Studies have shown that rates exceeding 15% do not improve maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Our study aimed at determining the prevalence, indications, and community perceptions of caesarean section delivery in Eastern Uganda. Methods and Materials. It was both health facility and community based cross-sectional descriptive study in Ngora district, Eastern Uganda. Mixed methods of data collection were employed in which quantitative data were collected by retrospectively reviewing all charts of all the mothers that had delivered at the two comprehensive emergency obstetric care service facilities between April 2018 and March 2019. Qualitative data were collected by focus group discussions till point of saturation. Data were entered into EpiData (version 3.1) and analysed using SPSS software (version 24). Qualitative data analysis was done by transcribing and translating into English verbatim and then analysed into themes and subthemes with the help of NVIVO 12. Results. Of the total 2573 deliveries, 14% (357/2573) were by CS. The major single indications were obstructed labour 17.9%, fetal distress 15.3%, big baby 11.6%, and cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) 11%. Although appreciated as lifesaving for young mothers, those with diseases and recurrent intrauterine fetal demise, others considered CS a curse, marriage-breaker, misfortune, money-maker and a sign of incompetent health workers, and being for the lazy women and the rich civil servants. The rise was also attributed to intramuscular injections and contraceptive use. Overall, vaginal delivery was the preferred route. Conclusion. Several misconceptions that could hinder access to CS were found which calls for more counselling and male involvement. Although facility based, the rate is higher than the desired 5–15%. It is higher than the projected increase of 36% by 2021. It highlights the need for male involvement during counselling and consent for CS and concerted efforts to demystify community misconceptions about women that undergo CS. These misconceptions may be a hindrance to access to CS. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Busitema University en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Busitema University ; Hindawi en_US
dc.subject Caesarean section en_US
dc.subject Live births en_US
dc.subject Community perceptions en_US
dc.subject Caesarean section delivery en_US
dc.subject Uganda en_US
dc.subject Obstetric care en_US
dc.subject Neonatal morbidity, mortality en_US
dc.subject Maternal morbidity, mortality en_US
dc.subject Male involvement en_US
dc.subject Counselling en_US
dc.subject Maternal mortality ratio en_US
dc.title Prevalence, indications, and community perceptions of caesarean section delivery in Ngora district, eastern Uganda : en_US
dc.title.alternative mixed method study. en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BUOADIR


Browse

My Account