Bayesian inference for heterogeneity in meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorBodnar, Olha
dc.contributor.authorMuhumuza, Rebecca Nalule
dc.contributor.authorPossolo, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-30T09:06:01Z
dc.date.available2021-04-30T09:06:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-30
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractA generalized marginal random effects model is described that enables exact Bayesian inference using either the Jeffreys or Berger-Bernardo non-informative prior distributions without the need for Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling, requiring only numerical integrations. This contribution focuses on inference for the heterogeneity parameter, often called “dark uncertainty” and denoted τ in this contribution. The proposed models are used for consensus building in meta-analyses of measurement results for the Newtonian constant of gravitation, G, and for the effectiveness of anti-retroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis in preventing HIV infection. The estimates of τ that seventeen alternative different methods produce, including those that we propose, were also compared. The relative impact (gauged in terms of the ratio of the range of estimates to their median) that model choice had on the estimate of τ was very substantial: 79% for G and 87% for HIV prophylaxis. For G, the estimates of τ ranged from 0.0009×10−10m3kg−1s−2 to 0.0013×10−10m3kg−1s−2. For Truvada they ranged from 0.49 to 0.92. Since the estimate of τ impacts the quality of the estimate of the measurand substantially, we recommend the Bayesian approaches to estimate τ because they take the whole posterior distribution of τ into account, hence the corresponding uncertainty, rather than using a single value and pretending that it is known with certainty. In the case of the measurement results for G, we found that the model with Student’s t random effects and the Jeffreys prior provides the best fit, while for the Truvada data the normal marginal random effects model, also with Jeffreys prior, produces an estimate of τ closest to classical estimators like DerSimonian-Laird, but offers the advantage of recognizing and propagating the uncertainty associated with τ, which the classical procedures ignore. Keywords: marginal distribution, random effects, dark uncertainty, non-informative prior, shades of dark uncertainty, Jeffreys, Berger-Bernardoen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBusitema Universityen_US
dc.identifier.citationBodnar, O., Muhumuza, R., & Possolo, A. (2020). Bayesian inference for heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Metrologia 57 (2020) 064004 (13pp), https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/abb064.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/676
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBusitema University ; IOP Publishingen_US
dc.subjectMarginal distributionen_US
dc.subjectRandom effectsen_US
dc.subjectDark uncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectNon-informative prioren_US
dc.subjectShades of dark uncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectJeffreysen_US
dc.subjectBerger-Bernardoen_US
dc.titleBayesian inference for heterogeneity in meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Bodnar, Olha, Muhumuza, Rebecca N. & Possolo, Antonio - FSE- Dept. of Mathematics, 2020.pdf
1.16 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format
Article
Bodnar, Olha, Muhumuza, Rebecca N. & Possolo, Antonio - FSE- Dept. of Mathematics, 2020-Abstract.pdf
123.08 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format

license.txt
1.71 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission