Integrated malaria prevention in low and middle-income countries:

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Musoke, David
dc.contributor.author Atusingwize, Edwinah
dc.contributor.author Namata, Carol
dc.contributor.author Ndejjo, Rawlance
dc.contributor.author Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
dc.contributor.author Kamya, Moses R.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-16T06:19:30Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-16T06:19:30Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Musoke, D., Atusingwize, E., Namata, C., Ndejjo, R., Wanyenze, R. K., & Kamya, M. R. (2023). Integrated malaria prevention in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Malaria Journal, 22(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04500-x en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/3453
dc.description Journal article en_US
dc.description.abstract As many countries aim to eliminate malaria, use of comprehensive approaches targeting the mosquito vector and environment are needed. Integrated malaria prevention advocates the use of several malaria prevention measures holistically at households and in the community. The aim of this systematic review was to collate and summarize the impact of integrated malaria prevention in low- and middle-income countries on malaria burden. Methods Literature on integrated malaria prevention, defined as the use of two or more malaria prevention methods holistically, was searched from 1st January 2001 to 31st July 2021. The primary outcome variables were malaria incidence and prevalence, while the secondary outcome measures were human biting and entomological inoculation rates, and mosquito mortality. Results A total of 10,931 studies were identified by the search strategy. After screening, 57 articles were included in the review. Studies included cluster randomized controlled trials, longitudinal studies, programme evaluations, experimental hut/houses, and feld trials. Various interventions were used, mainly combinations of two or three malaria prevention methods including insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), topical repellents, insecticide sprays, microbial larvicides, and house improvements including screening, insecticide-treated wall hangings, and screening of eaves. The most common methods used in integrated malaria prevention were ITNs and IRS, followed by ITNs and topical repellents. There was reduced incidence and prevalence of malaria when multiple malaria prevention methods were used compared to single methods. Mosquito human biting and entomological inoculation rates were significantly reduced, and mosquito mortality increased in use of multiple methods compared to single interventions. However, a few studies showed mixed results or no benefits of using multiple methods to prevent malaria. Conclusion Use of multiple malaria prevention methods was effective in reducing malaria infection and mosquito density in comparison with single methods. Results from this systematic review can be used to inform future research, practice, policy and programming for malaria control in endemic countries. Keywords: Integrated approach, Malaria prevention, Multiple methods, Low- and middle-income countries en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Makerere University, Busitema University en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.subject Integrated approach en_US
dc.subject Malaria prevention en_US
dc.subject Multiple methods en_US
dc.subject Low- and middle-income countries en_US
dc.title Integrated malaria prevention in low and middle-income countries: en_US
dc.title.alternative a systematic review en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BUOADIR


Browse

My Account