Flood risk assessment and mitigation along river Unyama:

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Namonye, Sam
dc.contributor.author Kia, Esther
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-23T12:43:42Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-23T12:43:42Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Namonye, S. & Kia, E. (2023). Flood risk assessment and mitigation along river Unyama: case study: Elegu flood plain, Amuru district. Busitema University. Unpublished dissertation en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12283/3684
dc.description Dissertation en_US
dc.description.abstract Unyama sub-catchment has an estimated drainage area of 1565 km 2 covering parts of Gulu and Amuru districts. The high stages of R. Unyama in Elegu flood plain are caused by heavy rains in Gulu and Amuru districts. This challenge has existed since 1960 but limited interventions have been done as businesses and other activities continue to be stifled. This research focused on flood risk assessment and mitigation along river Unyama in Elegu flood plain. Flood risk assessment was done through hydrologic and hydrodynamic modelling techniques. Since R. Unyama is not gauged, a rainfall-runoff model was developed using Arc-SWAT, Gumbel distribution method was used to analyze discharges for various return periods. Flood analysis was done using HEC-RAS software version 6.2, flood inundation maps corresponding to discharges of different return periods were developed and analyzed. A multi criteria approach was used to determine the most effective structural flood mitigation measure along river Unyama. Diversion and detention was found to be the most appropriate mitigation measure, Diversion channels were designed upstream of Elegu flood plain to divert the flood water before it reaches Elegu flood plain and store it in detention ponds such that it can be released at gradual and controlled intervals with an aim of attenuating the flood., the diversion and control structures were designed and simulated in HEC-RAS. Detention ponds were sized using hydrology studio, a flood routing-based software. The findings of the study were as follows; the discharges of 5, 7, 10, 25, 100 and 200-year return periods were 200m3/s, 233m3/s, 270m3/s, 360m3/s, 493m3/s, 558m3/s respectively. A 10-year return period discharge of 270 m 3 /s was considered as the design discharge of the diversion structure. Three diversion channels were designed and simulated, diversion channels one, two and three diverted, 29.3%, 33.7% and 15.6% of the total peak flow respectively from the river to detention ponds while 21.5% of the total peak discharge continued to Elegu flood plain where very minimal flooding occurred with maximum flood depth of 0.009m. Some of the recommendations included; the MWE should consider installing a river gauging station on River Unyama to ensure availability of accurate and reliable data, research should be done on willingness to pay for project implementation by the local people, the scouring effect of water on the gates and the channels should also be investigated. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Mr. Oketcho Yoronimo, Mr. Mugisha Moses, Busitema University en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Busitema University en_US
dc.subject Flood risk en_US
dc.subject Assessment and mitigation en_US
dc.subject Flood risk assessment en_US
dc.subject Flood mitigation en_US
dc.title Flood risk assessment and mitigation along river Unyama: en_US
dc.title.alternative case study: Elegu flood plain, Amuru district en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BUOADIR


Browse

My Account